That’s the only explanation I have for this look on her face. It’s like someone offered her a bite of something they personally made, and she took a bite, and it was really vile but she she wanted to make the person feel good so she just tried to smile her way through the puke that was rising to the top of her throat.
Either that, or the Family Guy is right. She just looks like a foot.
I think the meal was prepared by the woman standing behind her. She has a look like “do you liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiike it??” Also, I bet Amy Winehouse is close by, ready to punch her out for stealing her bee hive. Yikes. Not the kind of chick fight guys want to see.
There are two female humans on planet earth more unattractive than Sarah Jessica Barker
uh
Parker…
Amy Winehouse and Hillary Clinton, who said she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, who was unknown until he climbed K2… almost a decade AFTER she was born!!! Liar, liar pants on fire…
Can you believe there are people, most of them rednecks, who adore this dog?? I mean, if I were her, I’d probably go downtown on a Saturday night, a real seedy part of town so I’d fit right in.
I’d get real drunk and pass out in the alley behind the bar next to the dumpster in hopes that in my drunken unconsciousness a big fat rat would come by and chew that thing off my chin.
No talent bitch, go stir your caldron. Here, I have a conical hat and round broom for ya. Put the handle between your legs with the straw part behind you, find a cliff and JUMP OFF!!!
Did a quick fact check. Hillary says her mother read an article about Sir Edmund when she was pregnant with her and liked the name.
Sen. Clinton was born in 1947, from what I could gather, or early ‘48.
There were no articles of any kinc found by snopes.com concerning Sir Edmund Hillary in any of the newspapers or periodicals available in the Chicago area until after he climbed K2.
She lies, lies, lies…..
The story about Hillary Clinton being named after Sir Edmund Hillary did not appear in any stories or writings of any kind about the first lady until after her 1995 South Asian tour when she briefly met the aging mountain climber.
Nor was the tidbit in any of her biographies or even her own autobiography written in 2003.
Bill mentioned it in his 2004 autobiography briefly, to be fair. In just a few minutes I have come across an amazing amount of material written about the first lady going all the way back to her days as a Wellesley graduate in 1969 when she was featured in Life Magazine.
(well known lug)
The fact that this story about how she got her name appears only this one time in all those many, many decades (WOW is she OLD) is rather incredible, says snopes. I agree.
“liar liar pants suit on fire…”
Jennifer Hanley, spokesman for the campaign, discounted the story as a fib told to Hillary by her mother to inspire her to greatness.
(get me my waders, it’s gettin’ deep here…)
If this is true, she still knew it was “just a sweet little story”.
If we are to accept this explanation, one has to believe that only after Hillary Clinton was over sixty years old, and after she was lauded in the press for over ten years as being named after the intrepid mountain climber who was unknown in the us before June, ‘53, and only after her husband told the story as true in his book, did her mother confess this was a “sweet family story”.
Hillary Clinton cannot claim that others are spreading lies about her since she is the one who initiated the claim in 1995.
Her lips were moving again, and the lies were eeking out like flies out of a dead cow.
Hmm… No honor, fortitude, honesty or credibility. Morally reprehensible and ethically bankrupt. A perfect successor to dubya.
sorry for going off topic.