<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mariah Carey Shows Up At TRL, and Remains Annoying While Doing So.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.themockdock.com/2008/07/23/mariah-carey-shows-up-at-trl-and-remains-annoying-while-doing-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.themockdock.com/2008/07/23/mariah-carey-shows-up-at-trl-and-remains-annoying-while-doing-so/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hatchetwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.themockdock.com/2008/07/23/mariah-carey-shows-up-at-trl-and-remains-annoying-while-doing-so/comment-page-1/#comment-5390</link>
		<dc:creator>Hatchetwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themockdock.com/?p=2945#comment-5390</guid>
		<description>"He took it to new heights"  That's what TI (or however he spells it, whoever he is) did for her song.  

The woman is so inarticulate, it's really painful to listen to her.  What the heck does "He took it to new heights" mean?  Was it written in the depths and saved only by TI's artistry?  Does it mean she went from mere arousal to orgasmic vocalizations?  Did TI merely raise the volume?  I just don't understand how supposed musicians and singers get away with this kind of bland characterization of their so-called oevres.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He took it to new heights&#8221;  That&#8217;s what TI (or however he spells it, whoever he is) did for her song.  </p>
<p>The woman is so inarticulate, it&#8217;s really painful to listen to her.  What the heck does &#8220;He took it to new heights&#8221; mean?  Was it written in the depths and saved only by TI&#8217;s artistry?  Does it mean she went from mere arousal to orgasmic vocalizations?  Did TI merely raise the volume?  I just don&#8217;t understand how supposed musicians and singers get away with this kind of bland characterization of their so-called oevres.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.themockdock.com/2008/07/23/mariah-carey-shows-up-at-trl-and-remains-annoying-while-doing-so/comment-page-1/#comment-5374</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themockdock.com/?p=2945#comment-5374</guid>
		<description>I HATE this song. I'll be loving you long time? Really? She should be saying 'me so horny' or something to that effect. Gross.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HATE this song. I&#8217;ll be loving you long time? Really? She should be saying &#8216;me so horny&#8217; or something to that effect. Gross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ka-Duh</title>
		<link>http://www.themockdock.com/2008/07/23/mariah-carey-shows-up-at-trl-and-remains-annoying-while-doing-so/comment-page-1/#comment-5365</link>
		<dc:creator>Ka-Duh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themockdock.com/?p=2945#comment-5365</guid>
		<description>I like how in the beginning where it says "Up Next" and under that it says "you'll be loving Mariah Carey." Yeah... more like "You'll want to stab yourself in the ears so you can't hear this b*tch anymore."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how in the beginning where it says &#8220;Up Next&#8221; and under that it says &#8220;you&#8217;ll be loving Mariah Carey.&#8221; Yeah&#8230; more like &#8220;You&#8217;ll want to stab yourself in the ears so you can&#8217;t hear this b*tch anymore.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
