Various reports, as well as the cover of this magazine itself, insist that this is Kate Hudson. It looks like the vampire version of Kate Hudson, maybe, but it certainly doesn’t actually look like Kate Hudson. Which, if I’m Kate Hudson, I don’t really know how to take that. I mean, how would you feel if a magazine called you and said, “Yeah…we’d like you to be on the cover of our magazine, only we want to make you look as little like you as we can possibly make you look without, you know, having an entirely different person on the cover. How does that sound?”
I would feel kind of bad, really. But then, I’m not a crazy celebrity.
When I first saw that, I thought she was Kate Moss. By way of Elvira.
Hey, it does look like Kate Moss! I was wondering why it looked so familiar, yet not look like Hudson.
The makeup is too much. Normally I try to have it look natural, but she looks like a creepy porcelain doll. If there was any part of her face that actually NEEDED the makeup, it’d be the brows.
How would you consider this art? They took a mediocre picture of her and photoshopped it to death!
And what’s with this “girl next door”? She’s nobody’s “girl next door” unless they live next to a brothel.
Her movies too. Have you seen “Raising Helen”??? “How to Lose a guy in 10 Days”? Ugh!! Stupid-stupid stupid!!! And for some reason she keeps staying on Hollywood’s radar…
Go figure!
I accidentally LOVE How To Lose A Guy In Ten Days.
She doesn’t look like any real person…. but cool in a totally un-Kate Hudson yeah, vampirish sort of way…
Maybe I’m the weird one out of the group, but I kinda like this picture.