Comments on: You Know What Bunny And I LOVE?

By: Punky

Punky — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:54:44 +0000

I can totally see the ad for it - ON THE NEXT MAURY, and then the teaser being Maury saying, “John,” and then cutting directly to where he runs off stage to the green room crying. Then I can hear the baby momma saying, “You got me no milk for that baby, no Pampers, no child support! I had to prostitute myself to pay for that baby!” You get the idea.

By: Danny

Danny — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:12:39 +0000

Ooooh… I totally forgot the PPV angle.

Seriously, why is nobody proposing this? They’d make ZILLIONS!!!!

By: Punky

Punky — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:00:13 +0000

I would totally pay for a Pay-per-View show of this event. I want to hear him screaming and crying like a girl!

By: Danny

Danny — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:12:09 +0000

Blah blah blah blah blah…

Let’s get to the real issue here:
How much money would you pay to be in the audience of the Maury episode where the baby’s daddy is revealed?

If I was in charge, not only would the baby’s daddy be revealed by Maury, but it would in a “Very Special” episode… LIVE FROM MADISON SQUARE GARDEN.

I want to see Andrew Young, John Edwards, and Rielle Hunter up on stage when Maury says, “In the case of Francis Quinn Hunter… John Edwards… You ARE the father!”

And, I bet you’d have no problem selling out MSG for that event either. If tickets were $100 each, I wouldn’t even flinch. $250 for good seats sounds like a good deal to me. I can’t even imagine how much tickets would go for on eBay. But, I’d be there. I can even see John Edwards running off the stage now…

By: Mockarena

Mockarena — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:11:03 +0000

Sammie - whenever there are republican candidates as douchey and despicable as Edwards who do mockable things, you can bet I will mock them.

I suppose I can’t really mock his supporters for not knowing about the affair, but the fact that anyone supported him to begin with is mockable to me. He is the quintessential rat of a lawyer who clogged up the legal system with frivolous lawsuits for his own monetary gain, and killed every bill he could which would have set caps on what personal injury lawyers could get in settlement fees. He said he’d ask Americans to give up their SUV’s, although he owns a fleet of them. He’s so shady that yes, I have to question why anyone in their right mind would have supported him - affair or not.

By: Punky

Punky — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:25:32 +0000

The fact that he stayed in the race after learning that his wife was suffering a recurrence of her cancer was shameful. What if his wife would have passed away? What would he say to his young children? “Gee, kids, I know we could have spent some wonderful, quality time with Mommy before she left us, but I felt this overwhelming urge to continue a race I was already losing?” That just turned me off completely. Then to learn that he’d been cheating on her, saying, “I’ve already beaten myself up.” Are you kidding me? Just that comment alone shows what a self-centered a-hole he is, and that he just doesn’t get what he put his family through. God bless his long-suffering wife and family. They must have the patience of Job, and are definitely better people than I am. I’d have kicked his butt to the curb after shaving his head in the night.

By: sammie

sammie — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:12:55 +0000

Mockarena, I’m curious. Would you be so gleeful if this had happened to a former Republican presidential candidate?

I am also confused why the people who supported are being castigated? They somehow should have known?

I don’t find this news gloat-worthy. I just think it’s sad.

By: rosie too

rosie too — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:52:44 +0000

As the Divine Miss M said earlier, choosing the next leader of the free world is not really something to mock (to quote you back to you). I don’t like John Edwards and I wouldn’t have voted for him. And his douchetastic response to the whole situation makes him even less likable. Yes, schadenfreude rocks. So, mock him all you like, but I wish you’d leave his supporters out of it. Sorry to be a mock-blocker, but there you have it…

By: Hatchetwoman

Hatchetwoman — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 04:56:18 +0000

Tammy, that’s a mighty big assumption — that because they’re still together, she didn’t have a problem with it. I’ve known several couples where the woman was almost destroyed by her husband’s affair, but stayed with the husband because he expressed remorse and the desire to try to repair the damage. There ARE reasons that people stay married through thick and thin other than indifference.

Edwards, however, is engaging in the kind of prevarication that passes for remorse. He denies the affair, but claims that he was 99% honest?! He used the other woman without loving her and claims that as some sort of moral victory? His wife’s cancer was in remission so anything goes?

If he didn’t love the other woman, the affair was over, and he’s not the father of the child, then what was he doing in a hotel room with them just a few weeks ago? Or has he ended the affair since then precisely so he could claim that it’s “in the past”?

What a piece of work. The only thing his argument “proves” is that he’s an arrogant asshole.

By: Tammy

Tammy — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 02:57:07 +0000

Seriously, who cares? So what. If his wife doesn’t have a problem with it (and since they are still together I presume she got past it) then why should the rest of us? Ho hum.