I think Sean Puffy Diddy Daddy Skiddley Do Combs probably thinks this is a nice photo of him and his daughters. I don’t know about you guys, but there is something really disturbing and weird about this picture. He looks less like a dad and more like a pimp, which, since these are TODDLERS, makes the whole scene kinda gross.
Celebrities are dumb. Couldn’t he have put them in nice dresses and taken a photo at a park somewhere, and then actually SMILED for the photo? You know, to show that he is ENJOYING being a dad?
HATE.
He always creeps me out…ever since JLo….notice how he has the *BLING* more prominently displayed than the two precious little girls…it’s all about the Puffdaddy.
The bowties made me think they were boys. Gross. This photo should never have been released. Those girls are going to die when they’re old enough to realize how embarrassing this is.
This photo was for a MAGAZINE PHOTO SHOOT!!!! How sick is that? I realize that everyone takes naked baby pics… embarrassing ones where naked 2 year old is on the toilet, etc. but to publish this in a magazine is just wrong… not to mention the fact that you know some sick pedo is probably really enjoying this photo.
And by the way, did anyone else notice that the twin next to Dumb Diddy Do is grasping her sister’s thigh and pleading with the camera man to get her out of here?
So so wrong. Bordering on child porn. Shame on their mother for allowing this…a fortune on therapy in the making. I think I feel a little queasy.
I get the feeling that he’s using them as an accessory, a kind of “Look, I’m a REAL man, here’s the fruit of my manly, blinged-out loins.” They’re not actual people to him, just commodities.
Sick, just sick.
Give us something, at least some cute little dresses. Something! He doesn’t need to smile or show how excited he is to be with his two little girls. He can show off the bling in the forefront and have it overshadow the girls. Whatever, just give us something that at least resembles a potentially normal portrait. I don’t know about this guy.. But then again I’m not surprised
By putting collars (er, bowties) on the toddlers, he is emphasizing their nudity and his ownership of them. And placing them on a fur coat is just another “luxurious” way to pimp out his daughters. This sick sexualization of children has got to stop. And even if it is a layout for a magazine and a photographer choreographed the photos, it is a parent’s responsibility to shield their children and refuse to pose them in such a manner. Diddly Squat failed miserably in the fathering department.
This is just so fundamentally wrong for a myriad of reasons. Eew is right.
I agree with R, when I saw those bowties, they did remind me of collars. The picture does creep me out.
This is pure grossness.
Yeah this picture is scary. It’s not like they’re his daughters at all; It’s like he’s doing an endorsement for the bowties they’re wearing.
guys, you are being WAY to harsh. i cant tell you how many times i been hanging out in my tux, with my bling, on my mink couch, with my hos, i mean daughters, and wished i had a pic of it. dont YOU?!
OK i loathe this man. LOATHE.
his POOR daughters! we all have pics of us naked as babies we wish our mothers would stop showing, but when it you, your sister, bowties, bling and DAD?!!? come on, thats BAD!