A woman over at my other site gave me a hard time this morning about using the word “landbeast.” It’s mean and insensitive and cruel and heavy people aren’t always heavy by choice and some people really struggle, etc. etc. I tried to explain that I reserve the term for people who purposefully make themselves targets by going around in public in get-ups like the one featured above, but she still didn’t appreciate this kind of mockery.
Which is why I save the pictures for this site. The Mock Dock. Home to many many landbeasts, which is a fitting term for the person pictured above. She is a beast for wearing something this totally inappropriate, and she is on land. The end.
Bottoms up!!!
Just one more reason to say no to crack.
I call this “disproportionate confidence.” I might even call it “delusional”.
I love how her friend totally knows her freaky friend is getting her picture taken! Why isn’t the friend wearing shoes in a club? Eeew.
my eyes!
my eyes!!
(vomit just a little)
(( o.k, a lot!!))
Put those rolls back in the oven!
Okay, I am not losing my mind. I swear there was another landbeast post on here today. Did I miss some controversy?!
No – you missed my complete and total amnesia that I’d already posted the same picture back in December.
I am officially old.
Aw, man. I’m home alone 24/7 with a newborn and nothing entertains me more than a good ol’ TMD or COTR controversy. Oh, well…
Rachel – then check the “Oh Thank God” post at COTR. Pink Slip and I are having words.
What post was the landbeast argument on??
http://chicksontheright.com/2009/11/24/the-flotus-belt-fetish-continues/
OK, I *saw* the landbeastiness, but my first reaction when I saw the picture was that she had crapped her pants. WHO buys pants with caca-colored stripes down the back of the legs?
They’re “sandblasted”, Hatchetwoman. You know how the whole “antique”, worn-out look for jeans is all the rage now? Just be glad the jeans are covering as much as they do. They could be full of holes and “distressed”.
(Get it? Oh, I’m totally funny.)